Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10507, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2005912

RESUMEN

A global online survey was administered to 69 islet transplantation programs, covering 84 centers and 5 networks. The survey addressed questions on program organization and activity in the 2000-2020 period, including impact on activity of national health care coverage policies. We obtained full data from 55 institutions or networks worldwide and basic activity data from 6 centers. Additional data were obtained from alternative sources. A total of 94 institutions and 5 networks was identified as having performed islet allotransplantation. 4,365 islet allotransplants (2,608 in Europe, 1,475 in North America, 135 in Asia, 119 in Oceania, 28 in South America) were reported in 2,170 patients in the survey period. From 15 centers active at the start of the study period, the number of simultaneously active islet centers peaked at 54, to progressively decrease to 26 having performed islet allotransplants in 2020. Notably, only 16 centers/networks have done >100 islet allotransplants in the survey period. Types of transplants performed differed notably between North America and the rest of the world, in particular with respect to the near-absence of simultaneous islet-kidney transplantation. Absence of heath care coverage has significantly hampered transplant activity in the past years and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , Pandemias
2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 649525, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1295632

RESUMEN

The relationship between COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus is complicated and bidirectional. On the one hand, diabetes mellitus is considered one of the most important risk factors for a severe course of COVID-19. Several factors that are often present in diabetes mellitus are likely to contribute to this risk, such as older age, a proinflammatory and hypercoagulable state, hyperglycemia and underlying comorbidities (hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and obesity). On the other hand, a severe COVID-19 infection, and its treatment with steroids, can have a specific negative impact on diabetes itself, leading to worsening of hyperglycemia through increased insulin resistance and reduced ß-cell secretory function. Worsening hyperglycemia can, in turn, adversely affect the course of COVID-19. Although more knowledge gradually surfaces as the pandemic progresses, challenges in understanding the interrelationship between COVID-19 and diabetes remain.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/etiología , COVID-19/patología , Diabetes Mellitus , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/diagnóstico , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/patología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/patología , Diabetes Mellitus/virología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Pandemias , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
3.
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab ; 4(3): e00249, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1222611

RESUMEN

Aims: To investigate changes in physical activity (PA) and psychological factors during societal lockdown in people with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A cross-sectional study among Dutch adults with type 2 diabetes. Data were collected using online questionnaires. A multivariate multinomial logistic regression was performed with change in PA during societal lockdown as outcome and perceived change in stress, anxiety, perceived risk for COVID-19 infection, emotional well-being and former PA status as determinants. Results: Five hundred and sixty seven respondents filled out the questionnaire, 536 were included in the final analysis: mean age of 65.9 ± 7.9 years; mean diabetes duration 13.3 ± 8 years; 54% men; 47% reported no change in PA, 27% became less active and 26% became more active during societal lockdown. Participants who were more likely to become less active were participants who experienced more stress (OR: 2.27; 95% CI 1.25-4.13) or less stress (OR: 2.20; 95% CI 1.03-4.71). Participants who were more likely to become more active were participants who experienced more stress (OR: 2.31; 95% CI 1.25, 4.26). Participants with higher emotional well-being (OR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) were less likely to become less active than to report no change in PA. Conclusions: Changes in PA in people with type 2 diabetes during societal lockdown are associated with changes in psychological factors such as perceived stress and emotional well-being. People with diabetes and their caregivers should be aware of these possible changes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos
4.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 9(1)2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1021012

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Lockdown measures have a profound effect on many aspects of daily life relevant for diabetes self-management. We assessed whether lockdown measures, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, differentially affect perceived stress, body weight, exercise and related this to glycemic control in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a short-term observational cohort study at the Leiden University Medical Center. People with type 1 and type 2 diabetes ≥18 years were eligible to participate. Participants filled out online questionnaires, sent in blood for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis and shared data of their flash or continuous glucose sensors. HbA1c during the lockdown was compared with the last known HbA1c before the lockdown. RESULTS: In total, 435 people were included (type 1 diabetes n=280, type 2 diabetes n=155). An increase in perceived stress and anxiety, weight gain and less exercise was observed in both groups. There was improvement in glycemic control in the group with the highest HbA1c tertile (type 1 diabetes: -0.39% (-4.3 mmol/mol) (p<0.0001 and type 2 diabetes: -0.62% (-6.8 mmol/mol) (p=0.0036). Perceived stress was associated with difficulty with glycemic control (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in perceived stress and anxiety, weight gain and less exercise but no deterioration of glycemic control occurs in both people with relatively well-controlled type 1 and type 2 diabetes during short-term lockdown measures. As perceived stress showed to be associated with glycemic control, this provides opportunities for healthcare professionals to put more emphasis on psychological aspects during diabetes care consultations.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , COVID-19/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Aumento de Peso/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/psicología , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/tendencias , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Femenino , Control Glucémico/psicología , Control Glucémico/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/tendencias , Conducta Sedentaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA